PapaDrom (1:39:46 AM): your away is saying hello to me?!!? AWESOME!!! HI!!
Auto response from Miz Angelical (1:39:46 AM): S is for sleeping and that's good enough for me~
PapaDrom (1:42:00 AM): really quick sleepy
head, my trip to phila was a partial success, caught the train last second, got
to see her, she had just gotten home, went for a walk, got to talk... not
really focused... gave her the cd I made for her that had the letter on it... I
really wanted to tell her in person.. I feel like a half coward.. =/ oh well...
(God is your reading this... its in your hands) Have a great day today sweet
heart, message me!!! ;-)
Session concluded at 1:42:14 AM
Miz Angelical (6:58:00 AM): heey =) hope you're having a great daay even though you must be
tired :P ttyl~
PapaDrom (6:58:12 AM): yes tired
Auto response from Miz Angelical (6:58:12 AM): blahblahblahbrbblahblahblah
PapaDrom (6:58:27 AM): bye sweetie
Session concluded at 7:03:20 AM
Miz Angelical (7:24:07 PM): /waaaves
PapaDrom (7:45:15 PM): ripples!!!
Miz Angelical (7:48:04 PM): aHH
Miz Angelical (7:49:24 PM): nice timingg
Miz Angelical (7:49:32 PM): that was only about 20 minutes to
respond :-P
PapaDrom (7:55:47 PM): Frequently when two
people disagree about the morality of something, a third party steps in and
says something like this:
PapaDrom (7:55:59 PM): "Look, now. You
two hold opposing opinions, and that is your right. Who is to say that one of
you is wrong? No one can really say to one of you 'You are right' and to the
other 'You are wrong,' so let's forget the whole thing, all right?" Is
such a statement (the third party's remarks)--wholly aside from the possibility
that the third party may simply be trying to prevent the two from coming to
blows--a reasonable way of dealing with moral issues? Explain.
PapaDrom (7:56:08 PM): Instructions: Write
an essay (about 500 words) in response to the above topic. Give your essay a
title.
PapaDrom (7:56:21 PM): I need a good
opening paragraph
PapaDrom (7:56:27 PM): Help a brother out
PapaDrom (7:56:33 PM): Mrs. I love English
PapaDrom (7:56:41 PM): ......i hope
Miz Angelical (7:57:03 PM): haha
Miz Angelical (7:57:08 PM): hmmm
Miz Angelical (7:57:51 PM): darn my english fanatic friend
isn't home either
Miz Angelical (7:58:04 PM): alright lemme wrap my brain around
this one
PapaDrom (7:58:31 PM): Yes. I do believe
that the thirds parties comments is a reasonable way to deal with the moral
situation that is occurring between the first and second parties. This is one
of many different possible ways to deal with the situation. In my opinion
PapaDrom (7:58:40 PM): That is what I have
so far
PapaDrom (7:58:54 PM): I need a good
supportive sentence
PapaDrom (7:59:18 PM): It needs to start
with......in my opinion
Miz Angelical (7:59:38 PM): that's your opening paragraph?
PapaDrom (7:59:57 PM): the beginning
Miz Angelical (8:00:04 PM): well yes
Miz Angelical (8:00:08 PM): your thesis statement?
PapaDrom (8:00:36 PM): This is Bri's friend
joe by the way
PapaDrom (8:00:43 PM): I'm not too bright
Miz Angelical (8:00:51 PM): that's alright
Miz Angelical (8:01:17 PM): ok first off we should reword that
PapaDrom (8:01:27 PM): In my opinion looks
like it is the beginning of my thesis statement
Miz Angelical (8:01:35 PM): you don't want to start a
persuasive essay that way
PapaDrom (8:01:40 PM): ok
Miz Angelical (8:01:47 PM): but that's alright
Miz Angelical (8:01:49 PM): okay hmm
PapaDrom (8:02:18 PM): So what do you
suggest?
Miz Angelical (8:02:22 PM): wholly aside from the possibility
that the third party may simply be trying to prevent the two from coming to
blows
Miz Angelical (8:02:28 PM): could you.. reword that?
Miz Angelical (8:02:30 PM): or try
Miz Angelical (8:02:35 PM): it throws me off
PapaDrom (8:02:54 PM): entirely aside
PapaDrom (8:03:02 PM): wholly means
entirely
Miz Angelical (8:03:06 PM): meaning... well yea
PapaDrom (8:03:17 PM): excluding that......
Miz Angelical (8:03:25 PM): but .. so assuming that the third
party is not trying to avoid a fight?
Miz Angelical (8:03:28 PM): alright
PapaDrom (8:03:51 PM): The essay has
nothing to do with that
Miz Angelical (8:04:08 PM): alright thanks that helps
Miz Angelical (8:04:09 PM): heh
PapaDrom (8:04:13 PM): haha
Miz Angelical (8:04:24 PM): hmm alright i'll pretend i agree
even though i dont..
Miz Angelical (8:04:28 PM): umm
PapaDrom (8:04:33 PM): haha
PapaDrom (8:04:55 PM): That is one example
but my professor doesn't want that to be the focus point
Miz Angelical (8:05:21 PM): oh the wholly excluding crap you
mean?
PapaDrom (8:05:53 PM): yea
Miz Angelical (8:06:06 PM): alright so you agree that that's a
good way to deal with moral debates?
PapaDrom (8:06:25 PM): yea.
PapaDrom (8:06:47 PM): I just need help
getting the opening paragraph done and i will be good to go
Miz Angelical (8:06:59 PM): ookay
Miz Angelical (8:07:13 PM): well tell me a short summary of why
you agree
Miz Angelical (8:07:26 PM): organize your thouGHts sON
PapaDrom (8:08:17 PM): That is the
problem......I can't think of any
PapaDrom (8:08:26 PM): which is why i am
trying to get some ideas
Miz Angelical (8:08:49 PM): well i'll give you a few if you
scrap the agree idea and disagree :-P
PapaDrom (8:09:24 PM): ok
Miz Angelical (8:09:56 PM): you sure?
Miz Angelical (8:10:15 PM): here i'll explain why i disagree
quick
Miz Angelical (8:10:20 PM): *ahem*
PapaDrom (8:10:26 PM): ok
PapaDrom (8:10:42 PM): Oh sorry hang on a
sec........gotta turn on the microphone
PapaDrom (8:10:51 PM): ok your good
Miz Angelical (8:11:15 PM): =\ mic?
PapaDrom (8:11:38 PM): I thought it was
funny.......(And Joe smashes his head against the desk)
Miz Angelical (8:11:56 PM): thought WHAT was funny
Miz Angelical (8:11:58 PM): WEiRDO
PapaDrom (8:12:01 PM): lol
Miz Angelical (8:12:04 PM): holy moly
PapaDrom (8:12:08 PM): Ok forget the whole
thing
PapaDrom (8:12:12 PM): lol
PapaDrom (8:12:20 PM): Why do you
disagree.......lol
Miz Angelical (8:12:31 PM): arite arite
Miz Angelical (8:12:39 PM): lemme stock up on vocab words
PapaDrom (8:12:54 PM): ok
PapaDrom (8:16:52 PM): tough one isn't it
Miz Angelical (8:16:58 PM): alright so assuming that this argument
is taking place in the United States, each party thus has the complete
irrevocable right of freedom of expression according to the First Ammendment of
the United States Constitution. .. yes
PapaDrom (8:17:32 PM): ummm....explain irrevocable
Miz Angelical (8:17:42 PM): it can't be taken away
PapaDrom (8:18:07 PM): oh ok
Miz Angelical (8:18:42 PM): if this right is not used freely
among disagreeing parties then it has no purpose
Miz Angelical (8:18:47 PM): you know what i mean?
PapaDrom (8:18:58 PM): yea
PapaDrom (8:19:08 PM): But how do I fit
that into the paragraph
PapaDrom (8:19:51 PM): I really need
help......I need to pass this class....It is the third time i am taking it and
I don't want to fail again.....
Miz Angelical (8:19:53 PM): what's the point of having the
right of free speech if every time an argument comes up you're going to say
"let's just forget it"
PapaDrom (8:20:05 PM): ic
Miz Angelical (8:20:12 PM): it's okay you'll pass
PapaDrom (8:20:36 PM): I can't even write
the very first paper of the semester
Miz Angelical (8:20:49 PM): this one?
Miz Angelical (8:22:29 PM): but do you understand what i'm
saying? will you be able to defend that even though it wasn't your original
view point?
PapaDrom (8:22:38 PM): yea
Miz Angelical (8:22:45 PM): ok
PapaDrom (8:22:53 PM): I was just going
with whichever view point I thought created the most controversy
Miz Angelical (8:23:06 PM): heh
Miz Angelical (8:23:08 PM): yea
Miz Angelical (8:23:42 PM): i have a feeling many people may
still agree
Miz Angelical (8:24:05 PM): the question is phrased so that
it's almost biased toward that
PapaDrom (8:24:10 PM): Yup
Miz Angelical (8:24:17 PM): but we'll be rebels k?
Miz Angelical (8:24:19 PM): :P
PapaDrom (8:24:22 PM): ok
PapaDrom (8:24:30 PM): You are officially
my English tutor....lol
Miz Angelical (8:24:37 PM): heheheh
Miz Angelical (8:24:41 PM): alright
Miz Angelical (8:24:45 PM): opening
Miz Angelical (8:24:46 PM): hmm
PapaDrom (8:25:02 PM): Need a mic......lol
Miz Angelical (8:25:02 PM): it's probably the most important
part
Miz Angelical (8:25:19 PM): you have to grab their interest so
that they'll want to keep reading
Miz Angelical (8:25:28 PM): what's the mic obsession??? i don't
get it
PapaDrom (8:26:06 PM): Forget it
Miz Angelical (8:26:12 PM): heh okay
PapaDrom (8:26:25 PM): I know I need to
grab their interest.....I just can't seem to figure out how
Miz Angelical (8:27:14 PM): hehe thaat's ok
Miz Angelical (8:27:18 PM): atleast you know
PapaDrom (8:27:58 PM): What if I just
randomly blurt out the humungous size of my penis?
Miz Angelical (8:29:10 PM): i don't think that would impress
your professor
PapaDrom (8:29:20 PM): lol
PapaDrom (8:29:25 PM): He's a guy too
Miz Angelical (8:29:32 PM): well you never know
Miz Angelical (8:29:45 PM): heh
Miz Angelical (8:30:15 PM): and then you could be like "i
was just exercising my rights according to the constitution"
Miz Angelical (8:30:40 PM): as he writes the forsaken letter F
on your paper
Miz Angelical (8:30:48 PM): eeeehehehee
PapaDrom (8:32:38 PM): lol
PapaDrom (8:35:14 PM): -=-=-=-=-=-=-
PapaDrom (8:35:16 PM): hey darlin
Miz Angelical (8:35:28 PM): heey
Miz Angelical (8:35:32 PM): Bri?
PapaDrom (8:35:36 PM): you bet
PapaDrom (8:35:43 PM): thanks for helping
my friend
Miz Angelical (8:35:47 PM): what happened to my pupiL
Miz Angelical (8:35:57 PM): i have an opening set for him to
dive into
PapaDrom (8:36:10 PM): he is right here, I
am going to a carnival and I wanted to say hi and bye to you before I left
Miz Angelical (8:36:20 PM): aw have funnn
Miz Angelical (8:36:25 PM): win me a teddy bear
Miz Angelical (8:36:26 PM): :-)
PapaDrom (8:36:29 PM): we shall see
PapaDrom (8:36:32 PM): okay ;-)
PapaDrom (8:36:38 PM): {{{HUGS}}} see ya
Miz Angelical (8:36:42 PM): you dont sound ultra confident..
Miz Angelical (8:36:43 PM): :-P
PapaDrom (8:36:52 PM): (Joe) I'm back
Miz Angelical (8:36:56 PM): ookay
Miz Angelical (8:37:15 PM): okaay here
Miz Angelical (8:37:21 PM): It is one of the sole prides of
this country that the American people can discuss moral issues freely amongst
themselves. To interrupt a debate based on such issues and suggesting to
"forget the whole thing" would be to discharge one of the key
cornerstones that this nation is built on.
Miz Angelical (8:37:29 PM): something around there
PapaDrom (8:37:46 PM): Holy Shit that looks
amazing
Miz Angelical (8:38:04 PM): nah it's needs tweeking
PapaDrom (8:38:30 PM): We can tweek it
together coach
Miz Angelical (8:38:43 PM): /salure
Miz Angelical (8:38:46 PM): lute
Miz Angelical (8:38:52 PM): alright first off
Miz Angelical (8:39:01 PM): there's no and before suggesting
Miz Angelical (8:39:13 PM): ya go me for random conjustions
Miz Angelical (8:39:18 PM): JUNCTIONS
Miz Angelical (8:39:20 PM): AHHH
PapaDrom (8:39:44 PM): huh?
Miz Angelical (8:39:54 PM): nevermind
Miz Angelical (8:40:00 PM): i'm just not thinking tonight
Miz Angelical (8:40:03 PM): that's all~ sorry
PapaDrom (8:41:39 PM): lol
Miz Angelical (8:41:44 PM): It is one of the sole prides of
this country that the American people can discuss moral issues freely amongst
themselves. To interrupt a debate based on such issues suggesting that the
participating parties should "forget the whole thing" would be to
discharge one of the key cornerstones that this nation is built on.
Miz Angelical (8:41:48 PM): there tweakage done
PapaDrom (8:43:35 PM): kool
PapaDrom (8:43:44 PM): However......that is
only 2 sentences
Miz Angelical (8:43:51 PM): yesyes well
PapaDrom (8:43:52 PM): It needs to be like
5 or 6
Miz Angelical (8:44:40 PM): they're very important two
sentences
Miz Angelical (8:44:45 PM): :-P
Miz Angelical (8:44:47 PM): shup
Miz Angelical (8:45:06 PM): i think 5-6 is a bit much though...
Miz Angelical (8:45:19 PM): my introductions are usually only
maybe 4
PapaDrom (8:45:56 PM): ok
PapaDrom (8:45:59 PM): That works
Miz Angelical (8:46:14 PM): heh
Miz Angelical (8:46:50 PM): alright well
Miz Angelical (8:46:53 PM): good news
PapaDrom (8:47:00 PM): What's that?
Miz Angelical (8:47:03 PM): only 446 more words
Miz Angelical (8:47:05 PM): :-)
PapaDrom (8:47:10 PM): WOOOOOOOOO!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
PapaDrom (8:47:29 PM): How much longer you
gonna be online......or do I get you all night long?
Miz Angelical (8:47:53 PM): i'll be on for a while longer
PapaDrom (8:48:17 PM): kool
PapaDrom (8:48:32 PM): Oh i added onto the
paragraph
PapaDrom (8:48:38 PM): I added a comma
PapaDrom (8:48:45 PM): It's progress though
Miz Angelical (8:48:48 PM): aww what progresss
Miz Angelical (8:49:18 PM): um a comma doesnt really fit at the
end of that you know..
Miz Angelical (8:49:34 PM): or do you mean in the middle
PapaDrom (8:49:58 PM): Right before
suggesting
PapaDrom (8:50:25 PM): And one after forget
the whole thing
Miz Angelical (8:50:40 PM): aha sweet deal
Miz Angelical (8:50:59 PM): you sell yourself short sir, that's
two commas
PapaDrom (8:51:11 PM): lol
PapaDrom (8:51:24 PM): well I added the
second one while we were talking about the first one
Miz Angelical (8:51:36 PM): aha
Miz Angelical (8:51:39 PM): i see i see
Miz Angelical (8:51:44 PM): i hope you're righht
Miz Angelical (8:52:01 PM): i've never been a punctuation
master but i dunno about that placement
PapaDrom (8:52:01 PM): ha.......me too
PapaDrom (8:52:07 PM): It fits
Miz Angelical (8:52:15 PM): well yes, pause in speech
Miz Angelical (8:52:24 PM): but not so much a break in the
sentence
PapaDrom (8:53:33 PM): hmmmmm
Miz Angelical (8:55:16 PM): aright
Miz Angelical (8:55:21 PM): 410 words left
Miz Angelical (8:55:24 PM): ;-)
PapaDrom (8:56:06 PM): What are you writing
the whole thing?
Miz Angelical (8:56:25 PM): well noo
Miz Angelical (8:56:37 PM): but that's kind of an awkward place
to stop
Miz Angelical (8:56:46 PM): okay i just added what i'd said to
you before
Miz Angelical (8:56:56 PM): It is one of the sole prides of
this country that the American people can discuss moral issues freely amongst
themselves. To interrupt a debate based on such issues suggesting that the
participating parties should "forget the whole thing" would be to
discharge one of the key cornerstones that this nation is built on. Assuming
that the debate in question does indeed take place in the United States, each
party thus has the complete irrevocable right of freedom of expression
according to the First Amendment of the United States Constitution
Miz Angelical (8:57:01 PM): take it away~
Miz Angelical (8:58:24 PM): but lemme proof read lala~
PapaDrom (9:07:32 PM): hmmmmm
Miz Angelical (9:07:55 PM): hit a rut yet?
PapaDrom (9:09:08 PM): irrevocable?
PapaDrom (9:09:11 PM): Explain
Miz Angelical (9:09:20 PM): i already diddd
PapaDrom (9:09:34 PM): I forget
Miz Angelical (9:10:23 PM): ir"rev"o"ca"ble
\(')i-"re-ve-ke-bel\ adj : incapable of being revoked or recalled
(c)2000 Zane Publishing, Inc. and Merriam-Webster, Incorporated. All rights
reserved.Ýÿ½ÿÝÿ½ÿÝÿ½ÿÝÿ½ÿÝÿ½ÿÝÿ½ÿ
PapaDrom (9:10:38 PM): lol.....ok
Miz Angelical (9:11:35 PM): alright
Miz Angelical (9:11:39 PM): so no peeking
Miz Angelical (9:11:42 PM): what's it mean
PapaDrom (9:12:16 PM): You can't revoke my
right to an opinion
Miz Angelical (9:12:23 PM): basically
Miz Angelical (9:12:24 PM): hehehe
Miz Angelical (9:12:31 PM): you can't take it away
PapaDrom (9:14:13 PM): ah poop......My
mother needs me to go to my grandmoms house
Miz Angelical (9:14:26 PM): ahhk
Miz Angelical (9:14:33 PM): is it due tomorroW?
PapaDrom (9:15:09 PM): Thursday by 11:00AM
PapaDrom (9:15:13 PM): Online course
Miz Angelical (9:15:20 PM): not bad, not bad
PapaDrom (9:15:37 PM): Shadoe994@aol.com
PapaDrom (9:15:50 PM): I'll probably be
back in like an hour
Miz Angelical (9:16:06 PM): alright~
Miz Angelical (9:16:14 PM): i'll probably be here
PapaDrom (9:16:32 PM): k
PapaDrom (9:16:36 PM): Thanks for your help
Miz Angelical (9:16:40 PM): if not then just have me check what
you have tomorrow
Miz Angelical (9:16:43 PM): if you want
PapaDrom (9:16:47 PM): I'll see ya later
PapaDrom (9:16:48 PM): ok
Miz Angelical (9:16:48 PM): no problem~
Session concluded at 9:28:15 PM